Despite Collapse of Trump-Kim Summit, Diplomacy Is Still the Only Path > News

본문 바로가기

DISCLAIMER. Korean American National Coordinating Council, Inc. does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of some of the information or content contained in this website. These are only introduced for the Korean Americans and others to have a direct access to know the positions of the DPRK (North Korea) and some other opinions of ROK (South Korea). 


News

world | Despite Collapse of Trump-Kim Summit, Diplomacy Is Still the Only Path

페이지 정보

작성자 편집국 작성일19-03-04 07:39 댓글0건

본문

Despite Collapse of Trump-Kim Summit, Diplomacy Is Still the Only Path

 

BY  & Truthout March 1, 2019

 

 

In this handout photo provided by Vietnam News Agency, Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during their second summit meeting at the Sofitel Legend Metropole hotel on February 28, 2019, in Hanoi, Vietnam.

 

The second summit meeting between President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un in Hanoi, Vietnam, inspired hope for real progress in negotiations with North Korea, and an agreement on concrete steps toward denuclearization that has thus far proven elusive. While the talks ended with no agreement, diplomacy is still the only way forward.

 

There are troubling reports that U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton may have played a negative role in scuttling a potential deal by inserting an eleventh-hour demand to address North Korea’s biological and chemical weapons. However, U.S. positions on sanctions relief, humanitarian exemptions to sanctions, denuclearization and steps toward inter-Korean reconciliation have been far too rigid since last year’s Singapore Summit. Fixing that is not rocket science.

 

While no declaration announcing the end of the Korean War emerged from the Hanoi summit, that goal is still alive, and still crucial. While such a declaration could be seen as little more than a symbolic gesture, its benefits are actually quite concrete. Not only would it immediately relieve tensions and reduce the risk of renewed conflict, it would also provide the basis for further negotiations to conclude a formal peace agreement to finally and officially end the Korean War. Securing a final peace agreement is critical not only for reducing the risk of war, but also for advancing the goal of denuclearization, since the ongoing state of war is North Korea’s primary rationale for pursuing and maintaining a nuclear deterrent. South Korean President Moon Jae-in has already voiced his support for this type of declaration. Far from mere symbolic gestures, the end of war declaration and a formal peace agreement are both versatile diplomatic instruments that can be tailored to support U.S. interests while also mitigating North Korea’s security concerns.

 

While we don’t know all the details as to why the hastily organized summit did not deliver an agreement, President Trump did express approval of North Korea’s offer to permanently close its main nuclear facility at Yongbyon. While he mentioned his desire to address other nuclear facilities, shutting down the Yongbyon facility, a centerpiece of North Korea’s nuclear program, would be an excellent first step toward complete denuclearization. The price tag need not be too high; perhaps some sanctions relief for food, medicine and easing restrictions on non-strategic economic activity, and the opening of liaison offices (a step below embassies) in Pyongyang and Washington. That package should be able to come together soon, and wouldn’t necessarily require another summit.

 

Next, South Korea’s President Moon Jae-in, who has been tireless in his pursuit of peace and reconciliation, must play an enhanced, facilitating role, with China’s leader Xi Jinping perhaps joining in. In addition to nuclear diplomacy, deepening inter-Korean cooperation would foster a degree of economic interdependence between North and South Korea that would make the two Koreas more secure — economically, politically and militarily — and would help remove North Korea’s justification for maintaining a nuclear arsenal. It would aid in North Korea’s economic development. And because increased economic ties and security for North and South Korea mean increased security for the U.S., multilateral diplomacy and engagement is a win for everyone.

 

[Source: Truthout]

[이 게시물은 편집국님에 의해 2019-03-04 07:40:41 새 소식에서 복사 됨]
추천 0

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

인기게시물
A New Socialist Movement Must Oppose Both Capitalism and Imp…
북은 왜 <우리국가제일주의>를 외치는가?
In the era of peace, dissolve the UNC, the relic of the Cold…
조러정상회담을 시작으로 새로운 길로 들어서려고 한다.
미국외교협회와 대통령
[KANCCTV]김정은 위원장의 러시아연방 방문외 5편
세계를 재편하는 조선의 “새로운 길”
최근게시물
[사진으로 보는 노동신문] 5월 27일(월)
[사진으로 보는 노동신문] 5월 26일(일)
‘총련’은 어떤 조직인가
로동신문, 총련탄압하는 일본의 흉심 폭로
The Relations between DPRK and the US: Where Will It Go?
[일화] 제일첫자리 외 5편
서른살 전교조 “법외노조 취소하라”… ‘숨, 쉼, 삶을 위한 교육’ 새로운 30년 결의
북 조평통, 자유한국당의 정체 폭로
[사진으로 보는 노동신문] 5월 25일(토)
반성합니다_ 엿같은 노무현 암살 추도식
U.S. Is Accountable for Rupture of Hanoi Summit Talks: DPRK …
선박강탈, 미국이 조작한 대결의 불씨
Copyright ⓒ 2000-2019 KANCC(Korean American National Coordinating Council). All rights reserved.
E-mail:  :  webmaster@kancc.org